Saturday, June 27, 2009

The salvation of Micheal Jackson

<---This Micheal Jackson the way God created him. As you can see, he was a very handsome young man.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I just read that Micheal Jackson accepted Jesus in his heart very recently before he died. We must assume he did so with sincerity. If this is so, then there is absolutely no doubt, NONE, in my mind he is safe in the merciful arms of God, healed of all wounds, safe and free.

God is the God of Mercy and he takes us each when we are ready, the the moment when we are most likely to be saved, and if not saved, to prevent us from doing more harm.
But we can never know the eternal fate of someone, not really.

What we can only be sure of is that we all will stand before God and will have to account for our own sins...so instead of standing in judgment of Micheal Jackson, who from all accounts was a very confused human being who needed Gods healing very much, we should work out our own salvation in the fear and reverence of God the merciful judge, but nonetheless, the judge.
People get so caught up in life, they forget the end.

He was a tragedy. Personally, and I know some will disagree with me, but I'm going with my gut here, and I don't think he molested anyone. BUT...he was obviously a couple of cards short of a full deck nonetheless. I think a lot of people took him for what he was worth with a lot of accusations, he was vulnerable and naive, and rich. Too rich for his own good....and I am not a MJ fan...really...I never liked or listened to his music, I found his obsession with his non-whiteness, and ruining what was a very handsome face to become this freak, destroying his face and nose disturbing and really sad, and then to top it off, his procuring of his children like someone would go and buy puppy's very unwholesome. But then, in Hollywood, human flesh is a commodity, Jackson himself was treated as a commodity by his own father, so why should he not do the same to his kids? He grew up in the cesspool that is Hollywood; Hollywood shaped him, formed him....and so he never grew up, he was stunted and malformed spiritually and emotionally, and obviously mentally ill on some level.

I really am very happy to hear he found Christ so soon before he died. I truly hope it is true. My prayer is for the conversion of all of Hollywood, because as it is now, they are doing much harm to society.

Micheal Jackson was their perfect poster child.

Dina

Friday, June 19, 2009

Mohammed had two Daddy's

This is just fascinating...the liberal left is kowtowing to the muslim right. Gee, what will happen when their muslim kids are forced to read "Muhammed had two daddies"? you know it will happen because homosexual sex ed is being forced everywhere:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54420

http://www.missionamerica.com/agenda.php

This should be interesting. I think Christians should pull their kids out and let the marxists and muslims duke it out.

dina


NYC: Muslim Holidays in School; Christians Stonewalled


June 19th, 2009 by Catholic League

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on the news that the Education Committee of the New York City Council has approved two new Muslim holidays, Eid Ul-Fitr and Eid Ul-Adha, to be added to the school calendar:

On January 14, I testified before this very same committee requesting equal rights for Catholics/Christians: Jewish and Islamic religious symbols are displayed in the schools every December, but Christian symbols are banned. With the exception of Councilman Tony Avella, and a few others, the Education Committee showed no interest in appeasing Catholics. But its members are apparently capable of demonstrating great sensitivity to Muslims. Speaker Christine Quinn, who was raised Catholic—and who has shown no interest in the push for parity that the Catholic League wants—is now urging all City Councilmen to vote for this new round of Muslim rights.

What’s at work is the politics of multiculturalism: tolerance for some, intolerance for others. But this fight isn’t over yet.
This update courtesy of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights.

*ANNO DOMINI 2009*

* "THE SON OF GOD BECAME A MAN TO ENABLE MEN TO BECOME SONS OF GOD". - C.S. LEWIS

http://www.bethlehemstar.net/

"mohammed who???" ~GOD

Thursday, June 18, 2009

abortion is the UNCHOICE!!!!!

This site is the most amazing prolife site on thenet. It says it all and say's it with grace and forcefulness:
that abortion is the ultimate in misogynism and our society has fooled women into betraying the very heart of who they are: Mothers and nurturers!
God bless the creators of this site.
d.


The UnChoice
unwanted, coerced or forced abortion ...

post-abortion grief, trauma, injury and higher death rates

“You mean you didn't want to have an abortion?"

Her question pierced my heart. WOW, I thought, she doesn't know.

Portrait of a non-choice ...

  • 64% felt pressured by others1

  • More than half felt rushed, yet 67% received no counseling1

  • 79% were not told about available alternatives1

  • 65% suffer symptoms of trauma1

  • Coercion to abort can escalate to violence against women2

  • Coerced or forced abortion: internationally recognized as human rights abuse4

  • Homicide is the leading killer of pregnant women1, 2

"The rhetoric of choice suggests no coercion, direct or indirect."

"Concealing relevant information should be recognized as coercion. Deceptive information presented as fact also acts coercively."

"There seems to be no real screening process to protect women from unwanted abortions. If abortion providers ignore evidence of force being applied, they are complicit in forced abortion." - Melinda Tankard Reist, Giving Sorrow Words

Experts and others who deny the many faces and forms of unwanted, coerced or even violently forced abortion ... or dismiss the aftershock of grief, injury and death add salt to the wounds ... and put other teens and women at risk, too.

"Every time abortion is debated, it sounds 10 times as loud ...
it hurts 10 times as much."

What is the UnChoice?

Unwanted abortions, widespread coercion, forced abortion in America and elsewhere,
deceptive or inadequate counseling, ultimatums, non-support,
medical and other professional negligence, abuses & malpractice ...
as well as the heartbreaking, dangerous aftermath for women, men and families.

Infanticide Case Mesmerizes France????

Another woman is on trial for practicing medicine with out a licensed abortionist to help and people are mesmerized!

The real story are the comments to this story...FASCINATING.

and sad...that we have come to this in our culture.
d.

Woman Confessed to Killing 3 Newborns; Husband Was Unaware of Pregnancies

Jean-Louis Courjault and his wife, Véronique, talk to reporters in 2006, after the frozen bodies of two infants were found at their home in South Korea.
Jean-Louis Courjault and his wife, Véronique, talk to reporters in 2006, after the frozen bodies of two infants were found at their home in South Korea. (Associated Press)

Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, June 16, 2009

PARIS, June 15 -- When South Korean authorities announced in 2006 that they had found the bodies of two newborns in the home freezer of a French expatriate couple, the first reaction among friends and family was disbelief.

Véronique Courjault, 41, on the surface a devoted mother of two sons, and her husband, Jean-Louis, 42, a shy engineer specializing in diesel motors, at first said they had nothing to do with the macabre discovery. But from a murder trial underway for the past 10 days in Tours, 100 miles southwest of Paris, a grisly truth has emerged. The courtroom version of how the couple lived has fascinated France and left many people in shock and wonder.

Véronique Courjault, by her own admission, smothered the two babies after giving birth to them secretly in Seoul, the first in 2002 and the second in 2003. She also has acknowledged killing a newborn and burning the body in her garden after a first secret pregnancy in 1999, before the couple left France.

Jean-Louis Courjault, French prosecutors ruled, was never aware of his wife's pregnancies, or her lonely deliveries in the family bathtub and the subsequent slayings of three infants. After a long investigation, he was not charged, leaving unanswered how he could have failed to notice his wife's condition. He has attended her trial with the goal, he told reporters, of offering all the support he can.

Day by day, reporters from the national newspapers in Paris lay out the details of Véronique Courjault's testimony. But they remain unable to offer any understanding of why she did what she did. As the trial enters its final days, the mystery has absorbed the country.

"Personally I am sad, really sad for this lady," commented a visitor to one of several news Web sites tracking the case. "Yes, what she did could be qualified as cruel or some other adjective. But first, what I would like to understand is why this woman went ahead with her pregnancies, what she believed in, what her hopes were."

A local paper, the Nouvelle République, has stationed two reporters inside the courtroom with laptop computers to relay instantaneous, near-verbatim reports to the paper's Web site. Court authorities had banned television broadcasts but bowed to the new technology.

France 24, the French government's all-news television station, got so carried away by Courjault's fate last week that it invited visitors to its Facebook site to place bets on the verdict. After an outcry from a journalists union, the station's management suspended the betting, citing a "violation of procedure."

The level of interest flows not only from the horror of what happened to the newborn children. Such crimes are not unknown in France or other countries. While the Tours trial was underway, for instance, a troubled woman was convicted with little notice in Brittany, in the country's western corner, for killing her infant last year and putting it in a freezer. She was sentenced to eight years in prison and ordered to undergo psychiatric treatment.

But Véronique Courjault has caught the imagination of many countrymen because she seemed so ordinary until her dark secret was discovered. She and her husband were well known in Seoul's tightknit French community. She worked as a teacher's aide at the French kindergarten. Her husband, her family and their many friends, in South Korea as well as France, described her as normal, friendly and exceptionally close to her first two sons, now 14 and 12.

South Korean police were initially called by Jean-Louis Courjault after he discovered the two little bodies in July 2006 while trying to find room for some mackerel given to him by a South Korean acquaintance. At that point, he said, his assumption and that of Seoul police was that someone outside the family had put the bodies in the freezer. After leaving genetic samples to aid in the investigation, he and Véronique left on a previously planned trip to France.

When South Korean authorities discovered the children were the Courjaults', they notified the French government, and police in Tours began their own investigation. The couple, held in France, denied any connection to the bodies and suggested South Korean authorities were mistaken. But after weeks of questioning, French police said, Véronique Courjault gradually broke down and, that October, admitted the killings and told police about the first infanticide.

In testimony last week, Véronique Courjault no longer sought to deny responsibility. But as the presiding judge pressed for an explanation -- the court will have to decide whether she knew what she was doing -- she offered only vague clues as to what was going through her mind at the time.

"What I did is so monstrous, without explanation," she responded, according to reports from the courtroom. "For me, those children did not have a real existence." Asked how she could carry the children for nine months and still feel they had no existence, she said, "I knew it, and then I no longer knew it."

Family members testified that Véronique Courjault, short and stocky, frequently gained and lost weight and, as a result, wore loose-fitting clothes. That may have contributed to her ability to conceal her pregnancies, they suggested. But they had no explanation for her conduct.

Jean-Louis Courjault, with a receding hairline and long, dark sideburns, seemed skittish and unsure of himself as he told the court he never noticed his wife was carrying a baby. Once he did wonder a little, he said, when she seemed to gain weight and fatigue easily during a vacation to Morocco in 1999, just before the first killing.

"You should stop trying to find a reason," he told the chief judge when pressed to explain how he could live with Véronique as a husband and overlook three pregnancies.

More Proof of Hitler's Plan to Kill Pius XII

Son of German Intelligence Officer Comes Forward

ROME, JUNE 16, 2009 (Zenit.org).- New evidence published today by the newspaper of the Italian bishops gives more credence to the belief that Adolf Hitler had planned to either kidnap or kill Pope Pius XII.


It has long been conjectured that Hitler had ordered the SS commander in Italy, General Karl Wolf, to seize the Vatican and take the Pope.

Dan Kurzman wrote about it in his 1997 book "A Special Mission: Hitler's Secret Plot to Seize the Vatican and Kidnap Pope Pius the XII," which is based on interviews with Wolf himself. Wolf's accounts, however, could never be verified.

New evidence published today by Avvenire now points to the role of the Reichssicherheitshauptamt (the Third Reich's main security office) in devising a plot to take out the Pope.

The newspaper cited the testimony of Niki Freytag Loringhoven, 72, the son of Wessel Freytag von Loringhoven, who during World War II was a colonel in the High Command of the German Armed Forces.

According to the son, days after Hitler's Italian ally, Benito Mussolini, had been arrested at the orders of King Victor Emmanuel III, Hitler ordered the Reichssicherheitshauptamt to devise a plot to punish the Italian people by kidnapping or murdering Pius XII and the king of Italy.

Hearing of the project, Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, head of the German counterintelligence service, informed his Italian counterpart, General Cesare Amè, during a secret meeting in Venice from July 29-30, 1943.

Also present at the meeting were colonels Erwin von Lahousen and Wessel Freytag von Loringhoven, who both worked in Section II of German counterintelligence, which dealt primarily with sabotage.

Canaris, Von Lahousen and Freytag von Loringhoven had all been part of the German resistance against the Nazis.

Amè, upon returning to Rome, spread news of the plans against the Pope and the king in order to block them, which proved successful. The plan was quickly dropped.

According to Avvenire, this testimony coincides with the deposition given by Von Lahousen during the Nuremberg war crimes trials on Feb. 1,1946 (Warnreise Testimony 1330-1430).

Canaris was later dismissed as the head of German intelligence in February 1944, put under house arrest, and then executed in 1945.

The two colonels participated with Claus Graf Schenk von Stauffenberg in the failed July 20 Plot to assassinate Hitler in 1944.

© Innovative Media, Inc.

Friday, June 12, 2009

ARE WE ALL DOOMED?

Hysterical Interpretations Notwithstanding

June 12th, 2009 by Mary Kochan Print This Article Print This Article ·ShareThis

If you’ve been paying attention you have probably noticed that panic mongering is everywhere and “we’re all gonna die” level hysteria screams at the Internet user from every other website.

“American’s are running out of money to buy food,” read the headline of one forum post. Hmmm… that sounded serious and so I did a little digging. Turns out that, yes, indeed, the news came out in the early part of the year that Americans were cutting back on food expenditures and the amount of money being spent on food has continued to drop through this spring.

So is that evidence that Americans are “running out of money to buy food”? Is this TEOTWAWKI (the end of the world as we know it)? Has the SHTF (fecal matter collided with the rotating ventilation device)? Is famine right around the corner? ARE WE ALL DOOMED?!

Let’s have a bit of perspective.

It helps to know that the average family was wasting over $1000.00 of food a year. Just recently. I mean like less than one year ago — during the good times. Wasting. As in buying, not eating, and throwing in the trash. I kid you not .

So just being more careful, eliminating waste, would make a major dent in the average food expenditure.

But then there are all those lay offs and job losses. And guess what people who are laid off work have more of than they had before they got laid off? Time. Time to cook instead of swinging by the Fast Food Emporium. Time to slice and shred instead of putting an order in at the deli. Time to cook dried beans instead of opening a can. Time to cut up a chicken instead of buying prepackaged parts. Time to peel and slice potatoes instead of buying frozen French fries. Time to move grocery purchases away from higher-priced prepackaged and processed stuff and toward less costly, but more time-intensive, basic ingredients.

And we have to throw this little interesting tidbit from the vegetable seed industry into the mix:

By some estimates, garden seed, especially vegetable seed sales, were up by anywhere from 40 percent to well over 100 percent compared with recent years. In fact, some industry watchdog organizations suggest that seed companies in North America and much of Europe experienced their best year ever in 2008. We’re talking record seed sales … AND they project another record for 2009

And this :

The National Gardening Association predicts that 43 million U.S. households plan to grow their own fruits, vegetables, berries, and herbs in 2009 — that’s up 19 percent from 36 million households in 2008. In addition, 11 percent of households already active in food gardening plan to increase both the amount and variety of vegetables they will grow in 2009; 10 percent said they will spend more time food gardening this year.

Now people who are growing some of their own food will spend less in the grocery store. A 20-foot by 30-foot vegetable garden can yield more than 300 pounds of produce valued at more than $600. From an average cash outlay of $70, by the way. A rate of return to die for.

It helps to know that harvesting season has been under way in large parts of the country for months already, starting with the fast maturing autumn crops, spring cabbage, spinach, turnips, oriental vegetables, then the over-wintered onions, shallots and garlic followed by the early spring lettuce, peas, and radishes. It’s logical to think that some of the decline in grocery expenditure can be accounted for by people turning to their own gardens.

However, Americans are not just growing vegetables; they are raising consumable animals in record numbers as well. NPR recently reported about the explosion of interest in raising chickens, even in urban backyards, and they ended the report by noting that orders for chicks were so high that there was a four to six week wait for them.

Maybe they’ll get me next time, but I’ll pass on this hysterical ride. I don’t think my fellow Americans are running out of money for food, as much as they are turning toward self-sufficiency. They may be making less use of the massive corporate systems that produce, transport, and market food in the grocery stores. But they are making more use of shovels, watering cans, and gardening gloves — and chicken coops. Sounds like good news to me.

© Copyright 2009 Catholic Exchange

Mary Kochan, Senior Editor of Catholic Exchange, writes from Douglasville, Georgia. Her lectures are available from Saint Joseph Communications.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Obama's supreme court

The Sotomayor Question

June 5th, 2009 by Russell Shaw

Some years ago it was standard practice for the White House to check with non-government groups, including the Catholic bishops’ conference, to make sure that possible Supreme Court nominees met with their approval. This apparently has not been the case during the last 20 or 30 years. Regrettable as that may be in some ways, perhaps it’s just as well, considering that among those to whom the bishops’ national organization gave its blessing back in 1975 was John Paul Stevens. As a justice, Stevens has turned out to be reliably opposed to Catholic views on many matters of concern to the Church.

This routine outside vetting of potential candidates went on back in the days when those actually nominated were generally taken at face value and not examined too closely — the assumption being that nearly anyone a president might put forward would stand within the rough parameters of the national consensus on most issues. That, however, was before the Borking of Robert Bork by Sen. Edward Kennedy and others turned the Senate confirmation process into a blood sport, with the abortion controversy at the heart of it.

That glance at history brings us to Judge Sonia Sotomayor. In a better world than this, not Sotomayor but Mary Ann Glendon or someone like her would be heading to the court next fall to take the seat vacated by Justice David Souter. But the world is as it is, and so President Obama has tapped Sotomayor.

Besides being smart women lawyers, Judge Sotomayor and Harvard law professor Glendon have it in common that they are Catholics — sort of, anyway. Glendon is a serious Catholic, who served most recently as U.S. ambassador to the Holy See in the last year of the Bush presidency. Sotomayor was raised a Catholic, but now apparently practices irregularly at best.

If confirmed, she will bring the number of Catholics on the court to an unprecedented six, joining Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito. Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito make up the court’s conservative bloc. Kennedy is a swing voter. Sotomayor is expected to line up with the court’s liberals — Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer.

To some extent, she’s a liberal stealth candidate, with a skimpy public record on several hot button issues. At the moment, she may be best known for having been a part of a federal appeals court panel that ruled against white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., who claimed discrimination by the city. They were denied promotions when New Haven scrapped a color-blind promotion examination which they, but no African-American candidates, had passed. Supreme Court observers say the court is likely to overturn that decision before it adjourns in June.

On abortion, Sotomayor’s only noteworthy decision upheld the government’s right to refuse funding to groups that promote and perform abortions overseas. This is the so-called Mexico City policy that Obama overturned in one of his first acts as president. Since the abortion lobby found this worrisome, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, speaking for the president, obligingly declared that Obama was “very comfortable” with the nominee’s views. Obama has promised to name only pro-choicers to the Supreme Court.

As a Hispanic woman whose personal history of success against the odds reflects the American dream, Sotomayor seems almost certain to be confirmed. But senators have a duty as well as right to question her closely about her judicial philosophy. The Supreme Court and the nation at large are owed at least that much.

Russell Shaw is a freelance writer from Washington, D.C. You can email him at RShaw10290@aol.com.